![]() The same activity can of course have more than one goal. Kim indicates agreement that pure research “should have the saving of human lives as an important goal” since Kim’s position is that “Saving lives is what counts most of all.” Since Laird cites the saving of lives as one way in which pure research is worthwhile or valuable, Laird also indicates agreement that pure research “should have the saving of human lives as an important goal,” although Laird indicates that expanding knowledge and providing new ideas should be an even more important goal of pure research. Kim points out that “Without pure research, medicine would not be as advanced as it is.” Response (B) is incorrect since we can determine, based on their statements, that Laird and Kim would likely agree that pure research “expands the boundaries of our knowledge of medicine.” Laird notes that pure research provides us with new technologies that have medical applications. Kim indicates agreement with (A), at least in the case of medical technologies, by asserting that “Without pure research, medicine would not be as advanced as it is.” Response (A) is incorrect since we can determine, based on their statements, that Laird and Kim agree that pure research “derives its significance in part from its providing new technologies.” Laird explicitly cites the value of pure research with respect to providing new technologies. Kim, on the other hand, maintains that “Saving lives is what counts most of all.” Since pure research saves lives through medical applications, Kim disagrees with Laird about whether pure research has its most valuable achievements in medical applications. Of these, Laird considers the second contribution to be more worthwhile. Laird identifies two contributions of pure research: its medical applications (“technologies that contribute to saving lives”) and its role in expanding knowledge and providing new ideas. This question asks you to identify the point on which Laird and Kim disagree with respect to pure research. has any value apart from its role in providing new technologies to save lives.has its most valuable achievements in medical applications.should have the saving of human lives as an important goal.expands the boundaries of our knowledge of medicine.derives its significance in part from its providing new technologies. ![]() Laird and Kim disagree on whether pure research Without pure research, medicine would not be as advanced as it is. Even more worthwhile than this, however, is its role in expanding our knowledge and providing new, unexplored ideas. ![]() Laird: Pure research provides us with new technologies that contribute to saving lives. However, you are to choose the best answer that is, choose the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. In answering the questions, you should not make assumptions that are by commonsense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. ![]() Directions:Įach question in this section is based on the reasoning presented in a brief passage. The sample questions on the following pages are typical of the Logical Reasoning questions you will find on the LSAT. Professional Identity Formation Program.Application Requirements - LLM & Other Law Programs.Steps to Apply - LLM & Other Law Programs.LLM & Other Law Programs Application Process.Official Guide to LLM, Master’s, and Certificate Programs.Official Guide to ABA-Approved JD Programs.Prelaw Undergraduate Scholars (PLUS) Programs.Free Resources for Aspiring Law Students.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |